Montgomery Donaldson Bio

R. Montgomery (“Monty”) Donaldson is a partner in Montgomery McCracken’s Delaware office and Chair of the Business Litigation Practice Group. Monty's practice focuses on business counseling and litigation, with an emphasis on matters involving complex business transactions, corporate governance, securities, and special proceedings under the Delaware General Corporation Law and alternative entity laws. Monty’s litigation practice also involves an array of commercial matters, including commercial contract (such as co-development, licensing, merger and asset sale agreements), intra-organizational disputes (including member, partner and shareholder disputes), joint venture disputes, intellectual property cases, smear campaigns (internal and third party), and business tort cases. Many of these matters are litigated in the federal and state courts of Delaware, including the internationally-recognized Delaware Court of Chancery. In these and other representations, Monty is called upon to serve as primary counsel or as Delaware counsel in coordination with reputable firms located throughout the country and abroad. Services provided to these clients have involved consultation where litigation is threatened or in connection with transactions (such as controller transactions and inside funding rounds) implicating nuanced governance issues, the prosecution and defense of direct and derivative breach of fiduciary duty claims, and all manner of commercial disputes, ranging from “busted deals” and funding rounds in venture-backed companies to contract indemnity claims in the context of mergers, divestitures and asset acquisitions. Monty also counsels and oversees special committee processes, from inception through the deliberative process, negotiations and ultimate recommendation. Monty has provided Delaware legal opinions in the context of both routine and extraordinary transactions. He has published extensively, including most recently in the Delaware Journal of Corporate Law (“Inside Funding Rounds in Venture-Backed Companies: The Perils of ‘Effective Control’”). In collaboration with his corporate and transactional colleagues, Monty has counseled controlling shareholders, minority shareholders who may be deemed to exercise effective control broadly or in connection with a specific transaction, founders, directors and director committees in connection with a wide array of matters, including change in control transactions, funding rounds and internal investigations. Monty served as lead counsel under the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, representing institutional investors and shareholder classes in, among others, In re Dollar General Sec. Litig. and In re DaimlerChrysler Sec. Litig., the latter concerning the 1998 trans-Atlantic merger of Chrysler Corporation and Daimler-Benz AG. The settlements obtained in some of the cases in which Monty has been involved were among the largest obtained in comparable securities litigation. In addition to class claims, Monty represented a $120 billion state pension fund in opt-out litigation arising from a $58 billion merger creating at the time the largest U.S. banking operation. This matter settled at a substantial premium over the per share settlement obtained on behalf of the class. Monty was lead trial counsel in the widely-publicized Basho Technologies litigation (Basho Tech. Holdco B, LLC v. Georgetown Basho Inv., LLC, 2018 WL 3326693 (Del. Ch. July 6, 2018)). There, Monty and his trial team represented Basho’s co-founder, former CEO and Chairman of the Board and numerous affiliated investment entities. Monty’s clients claimed that a venture capital investor and its board designees committed serial breaches of fiduciary duty to secure majority control over and extract value from Basho (a data software technology company), ultimately causing the company to fail. Delaware Court of Chancery Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster’s 126-page post-trial opinion (affirmed on appeal) strongly condemned the actions taken by Basho’s controller, and awarded $20 million in damages to Monty’s clients. Further demonstrating the breadth of his experience, Monty was one of three attorneys representing a team of distinguished scientists who successfully challenged the U.S. government's intended disposition of 9,000 year-old human remains in the internationally-publicized "Kennewick Man" litigation, featured on NOVA ("Mystery of the First Americans") and the Discovery Channel ("Discover Magazine: The Earliest Immigrants"). He since has represented the Ethnic Minority Council of America in the equally controversial "Spirit Cave Mummy” litigation in the Federal District of Nevada. Monty received his J.D. from Dickinson School of Law where he was Senior Editor of the Dickinson Law Review and a member of the Appellate Moot Court Board. He earned his B.A. degree from Bucknell University.